MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE?
Wendy Grenade
On the surface, the recent Cabinet reshuffle in Grenada may appear straightforward but closer examination suggests that there is more than meets the eye. The reshuffle has to be understood within the context of several interrelated challenges which the new NDC government faces.
The one-year old Tillman Thomas administration has to govern the
country in a period of transition after thirteen years of NNP rule. The
NDC government also has to balance long-term development goals, in the
midst of a global financial and economic crisis and short-term
expectations of Grenadians. The Prime Minister also has to ensure
party cohesion within his team. It is against this background that the
recent Cabinet reshuffle assumes significance.
Cabinet reshuffles are generally motivated by two things: the need to
reposition the team to enable it to function more effectively; and
internal party dynamics. I do not doubt that the Prime Minister’s
intention is to ensure he maximises the talents of the team but there
are some aspects of the reshuffle which more than meet the eye.
Prime Minister Thomas has de-linked culture from the Ministry of Youth
Empowerment and Sports and has added it to his already heavy workload.
As part of this move he has also shifted Senator Arley Gill to the
Prime Minister’s Ministry as Minister of State for Information,
Information Technology and Culture.
There could be several explanations for this. Perhaps there is need to
redefine and elevate the role of culture, hence its location in the
Prime Minister’s Ministry. Or, the move may not have been about culture
per se, but the Prime Minister may have been dissatisfied with the
former arrangement and needed to move Senator Gill from within the
Ministry of Youth Empowerment, Sports and Culture. As we say in our
local parlance, ‘there is more in the mortar than the pestle’.
Minister Peter David was relieved of responsibility for the Ministry of
Tourism and is now Minister for Foreign Affairs solely. Given the
general perception that Foreign Affairs is an ‘important’ ministry, it
may have been viewed as a demotion in some circles had Minister David
been removed from that position. Such a move would have signalled a
measure of unease within the NDC camp, which the Prime Minister cannot
afford at this time.
Nonetheless, given the complexities of the global system there is need
for a Foreign Minister who can focus his/her energies to advance
Grenada’s foreign policy agenda. Modern diplomacy has become more
difficult and diverse. There are new actors and new, complex,
cross-cutting issues. Without the responsibility of tourism, Minister
David has an opportunity to concentrate on redefining the relevance of
Foreign Affairs and shaping a pragmatic diplomacy. His challenge is to
effectively lead a team which can maximise Grenada’s relations with the
rest of the world in order to bring greater benefits to the lives of
Grenadian people.
The Ministry of Tourism was entrusted to Minister Glynis Roberts. It is
logical to argue that given the current global crisis and its impact on
the global tourism industry, it is necessary to have a minister with
full responsibility for tourism who can dedicate time and effort to
manage the needs of the sector at this critical time. Minister Roberts
will have to hit the ground running.
This is an opportunity for her to spearhead a national effort to
re-think the role of tourism and its linkages with other key sectors in
the economy. It is also imperative for her to lead a team that can
continue to fashion a unique Grenadian brand and seek traditional and
new avenues to promote sustainable tourism. Minister Roberts’ success
will depend to a large extent on her ability to positively engage the
various stakeholders in the industry.
It is no surprise to many observers that Senator Ann Peters was
elevated from junior minister to Minister for Health. Given her
knowledge of and passion for the health sector, she has the opportunity
to bring together her experiences as an activist and practitioner to
make a meaningful impact on Grenada’s health sector. This move also
enables former Health Minister Karl Hood to draw on his experience as a
former pastor to make positive inroads in the Ministry of Labour,
Social Security and Ecclesiastical Affairs.
On a related note, three junior ministers were elevated to full
ministerial positions. Minister Michael Church is now the Minister for
the Environment, Foreign Trade and Export Development. Social
Development is now entrusted to Minister Sylvester Quarless and, as
mentioned, Senator Ann Peters now has responsibility for Health.
It is necessary to point out that MP’s are elected to represent the
people in Parliament and every MP does not necessarily have to be a
member of the Executive branch, “managing” a Ministry. Therefore,
there is absolutely nothing wrong in designating some MP’s as ministers
without portfolio. Again, there is no doubt that the Prime Minister’s
intention is to maximise talents to ensure the team functions more
effectively.
Yet, in my view, these shifts were not based solely on the need to
reposition members of the team or reward good performance. The Prime
Minister would have had to weigh the political costs of the moves and
the implications for party cohesion in the NDC. In my view, it may have
been easier for the Prime Minister had he made some hard decisions from
the onset and not try to include every MP in what is clearly an
oversized Cabinet.
With a repositioned team, the challenge for the NDC administration is
to simultaneously move beyond a transition phase, pursue a long-term
developmental agenda and deliver tangible benefits to Grenadians in the
short-term. If the administration can successfully accomplish this,
next year Scholar should not be able to sing, “Ah cannot defend yuh.”
Wendy Grenade is a Grenadian-born Lecturer in Political Science at the
University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados.
|